Source 1 : Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery, 2021
Source 2 : Enquête nationale périnatale de 2010
Source 3 : CNGOF 2012 — Accouchement en cas d’utérus cicatriciel, 2012 (Gynerisq)
Source 4 : Planned Vaginal Delivery after Two Previous Caesarean Sections, 1994
Source 5, 6 : The Failure Rate, Related Factors, and Neonate Complications of Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section, 2019
Source 7 : Outcome of the Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section during the Second Birth Order in West Kazakhstan, 2018
Source 8 : Indications de la césarienne programmée à terme, 2012
Source 9 : Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) – Mayo Clinic
Source 10 : Rupture of the Primigravid Uterus: A Review of the Literature, 2007
Source 11 : Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study, 2012
Source 12 : Uterine Rupture in The Netherlands: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study, 2009
Source 13 : Uterine Rupture and Dehiscence: Ten-Year Review and Case-Control Study, 2002
Source 14 : A 10-Year Population-Based Study of Uterine Rupture, 2002
Source 15 : Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français
Source 16 : Results of the National Study of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in Birth Centers, 2004
Source 17 : Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery, 2004
Source 18 : Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes, 2010
Source 19 : VBAC: Insight from a Mayo Clinic Specialist
Source 20, 27 : NIH Consensus Statement: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights, 2010
Source 21 : Uterine Rupture Associated with the Use of Misoprostol in the Gravid Patient with a Previous Cesarean Section, 1999
Source 22 : Uterine Rupture during Induced or Augmented Labor in Gravid Women with One Prior Cesarean Delivery, 1999
Source 23 : Uterine Rupture during Induced Trial of Labor among Women with Previous Cesarean Delivery, 2000
Source 24 :The Association of Maternal Age and Symptomatic Uterine Rupture during a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery, 2002
Source 25 : Effect of Previous Vaginal Delivery on the Risk of Uterine Rupture during a Subsequent Trial of Labor, 2000
Source 26 : Interdelivery Interval and Uterine Rupture, 2002
Source 28, 30 : Epidural versus Non-Epidural or No Analgesia in Labour, 2011
Source 29 : Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes, 2010
Source 31 : Epidurals: Do They or Don’t They Increase Cesareans?, 2015
Source 32 : Epidural Block or Parenteral Pethidine as Analgesic in Labour; a Randomized Study..., 1989
Source 33 : Maternal Morbidity Associated with Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries, 2006
Source 34 : Placenta Previa and Previous Cesarean Section, 1995
[1] Habak, Patricia J., et Martha Kole. « Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery ». In StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, 2021. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507844/.
[2] Enquête nationale périnatale de 2010
[3] GYNERISQ. « CNGOF 2012_Accouchement en cas d’utérus cicatriciel | Gynerisq », 2012.
[4] Chattopadhyay, S. K., M. M. Sherbeeni, et C. C. Anokute. « Planned Vaginal Delivery after Two Previous Caesarean Sections ». British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 101, no 6 (juin 1994): 498‑500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1994.tb13149.x.
[5] Asgarian, Azadeh, Nayereh Rahmati, Farzaneh Nasiri, et Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi. « The Failure Rate, Related Factors, and Neonate Complication of Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section ». Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 25, no 1 (27 décembre 2019): 65‑70. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_101_19.
[6] Asgarian, Azadeh, Nayereh Rahmati, Farzaneh Nasiri, et Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi. « The Failure Rate, Related Factors, and Neonate Complications of Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section ». Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research 25, no 1 (27 décembre 2019): 65‑70. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_101_19.
[7] Sakiyeva, K. Zh, Ibrahim A. Abdelazim, M. Farghali, S. S. Zhumagulova, M. B. Dossimbetova, M. S. Sarsenbaev, G. Zhurabekova, et S. Shikanova. « Outcome of the Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section during the Second Birth Order in West Kazakhstan ». Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 7, no 6 (décembre 2018): 1542‑47. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_293_18.
[8] HAS. « Indications de la césarienne programmée à terme », 2012. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2012-03/reco2clics_indications-cesarienne.pdf.
[9] Mayo Clinic. « Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) ». https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/vbac/about/pac-20395249.
[10] Walsh, Colin A., et Laxmi V. Baxi. « Rupture of the Primigravid Uterus: A Review of the Literature ». Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 62, no 5 (mai 2007): 327‑34; quiz 353‑54. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000261643.11301.56.
[11] Fitzpatrick, Kathryn E., Jennifer J. Kurinczuk, Zarko Alfirevic, Patsy Spark, Peter Brocklehurst, et Marian Knight. « Uterine Rupture by Intended Mode of Delivery in the UK: A National Case-Control Study ». PLoS Medicine 9, no 3 (2012): e1001184. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001184.
[12] Zwart, J. J., J. M. Richters, F. Ory, J. I. P. de Vries, K. W. M. Bloemenkamp, et J. van Roosmalen. « Uterine Rupture in The Netherlands: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study ». BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 116, no 8 (juillet 2009): 1069‑78; discussion 1078-1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x.
[13] Diaz, Sumac D., Jacob E. Jones, Michael Seryakov, et William J. Mann. « Uterine Rupture and Dehiscence: Ten-Year Review and Case-Control Study ». Southern Medical Journal 95, no 4 (avril 2002): 431‑35.
[14] Kieser, Katharina E., et Thomas F. Baskett. « A 10-Year Population-Based Study of Uterine Rupture ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 100, no 4 (octobre 2002): 749‑53. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02161-0.
[15] Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français
[16] Lieberman, Ellice, Eunice K. Ernst, Judith P. Rooks, Susan Stapleton, et Bruce Flamm. « Results of the National Study of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean in Birth Centers ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 104, no 5 Pt 1 (novembre 2004): 933‑42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000143257.29471.82.
[17] Landon, Mark B., John C. Hauth, Kenneth J. Leveno, Catherine Y. Spong, Sharon Leindecker, Michael W. Varner, Atef H. Moawad, et al. « Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated with a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery ». The New England Journal of Medicine 351, no 25 (16 décembre 2004): 2581‑89. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040405.
[18] Guise, Jeanne-Marie, Mary Anna Denman, Cathy Emeis, Nicole Marshall, Miranda Walker, Rongwei Fu, Rosalind Janik, Peggy Nygren, Karen B. Eden, et Marian McDonagh. « Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 115, no 6 (juin 2010): 1267‑78. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181df925f.
[19] Mayo Clinic. « VBAC: Insight from a Mayo Clinic Specialist ». https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/vbac/in-depth/vbac/art-20044869.
[20] « National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights March 8-10, 2010 ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 115, no 6 (juin 2010): 1279‑95. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5.
[21] Plaut, M. M., M. L. Schwartz, et S. L. Lubarsky. « Uterine Rupture Associated with the Use of Misoprostol in the Gravid Patient with a Previous Cesarean Section ». American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 180, no 6 Pt 1 (juin 1999): 1535‑42. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70049-9.
[22] Zelop, C. M., T. D. Shipp, J. T. Repke, A. Cohen, A. B. Caughey, et E. Lieberman. « Uterine Rupture during Induced or Augmented Labor in Gravid Women with One Prior Cesarean Delivery ». American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 181, no 4 (octobre 1999): 882‑86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70319-4.
[23] Ravasia, D. J., S. L. Wood, et J. K. Pollard. « Uterine Rupture during Induced Trial of Labor among Women with Previous Cesarean Delivery ». American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183, no 5 (novembre 2000): 1176‑79. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.109037.
[24] Shipp, Thomas D., Carolyn Zelop, John T. Repke, Amy Cohen, Aaron B. Caughey, et Ellice Lieberman. « The Association of Maternal Age and Symptomatic Uterine Rupture during a Trial of Labor after Prior Cesarean Delivery ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 99, no 4 (avril 2002): 585‑88. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01792-6.
[25] Zelop, C. M., T. D. Shipp, J. T. Repke, A. Cohen, et E. Lieberman. « Effect of Previous Vaginal Delivery on the Risk of Uterine Rupture during a Subsequent Trial of Labor ». American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 183, no5 (novembre 2000): 1184‑86. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.109048.
[26] Bujold, Emmanuel, Shobha H. Mehta, Camille Bujold, et Robert J. Gauthier. « Interdelivery Interval and Uterine Rupture ». American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 187, no 5 (novembre 2002): 1199‑1202. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.127138.
[27] « National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Vaginal Birth after Cesarean: New Insights March 8-10, 2010 ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 115, no 6 (juin 2010): 1279‑95. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e459e5.
[28] Anim-Somuah, Millicent, Rebecca Md Smyth, et Leanne Jones. « Epidural versus Non-Epidural or No Analgesia in Labour ». The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no 12 (7 décembre 2011): CD000331. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3.
[29] Zhang, Jun, Helain J. Landy, D. Ware Branch, Ronald Burkman, Shoshana Haberman, Kimberly D. Gregory, Christos G. Hatjis, et al. « Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes ». Obstetrics and gynecology 116, no 6 (décembre 2010): 1281‑87. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e.
[30] Anim-Somuah, Millicent, Rebecca Md Smyth, et Leanne Jones. « Epidural versus Non-Epidural or No Analgesia in Labour ». The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no 12 (7 décembre 2011): CD000331. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3
[31] Goer, Henci. « Epidurals: Do They or Don’t They Increase Cesareans? » The Journal of Perinatal Education 24, no 4 (2015): 209‑12. https://doi.org/10.1891/1058-1243.24.4.209.
[32] Philipsen, T., et N. H. Jensen. « Epidural Block or Parenteral Pethidine as Analgesic in Labour; a Randomized Study Concerning Progress in Labour and Instrumental Deliveries ». European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 30, no 1 (janvier 1989): 27‑33. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(89)90090-7.
[33] Silver, Robert M., Mark B. Landon, Dwight J. Rouse, Kenneth J. Leveno, Catherine Y. Spong, Elizabeth A. Thom, Atef H. Moawad, et al. « Maternal Morbidity Associated with Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries ». Obstetrics and Gynecology 107, no 6 (juin 2006): 1226‑32.https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000219750.79480.84.
[34] To, W. W., et W. C. Leung. « Placenta Previa and Previous Cesarean Section ». International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 51, no 1 (octobre 1995): 25‑31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292(95)80004-v.